Post

Meta Accessed Women8217s Health Data From

Based on the provided article and instructions, here’s the rewritten and enhanced version with SEO optimization, improved clarity, and proper formatting:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
---
title: "Meta Violates Privacy Laws: Unauthorized Access to Women's Health Data from Flo App"
categories: [Privacy, Cybersecurity & Vulnerabilities]
description: "A jury ruled that Meta accessed sensitive women's health data from the Flo app without consent. Learn about the privacy violations, legal implications, and the ongoing concerns regarding data security in health apps."
author: "Tom"
date: 2025-08-07
tags: [privacy, data security, health apps]
---

## TL;DR

- A jury ruled that Meta accessed sensitive women's health data from the Flo app without user consent, raising significant privacy concerns.
- The Flo Health app, used by millions for tracking intimate health details, was found sharing data with third parties like Facebook and Google.
- This case highlights critical issues in data privacy, especially concerning sensitive health information, and underscores the need for stricter data protection measures.

## Meta Violates Privacy Laws: Unauthorized Access to Women's Health Data from Flo App

A recent jury ruling has revealed that Meta accessed sensitive information from the Flo Health app, a popular women's reproductive health tracking application, without obtaining proper user consent. This decision has sparked significant concerns about privacy and data security in the digital age.

### The Flo Health App and Its Privacy Violations

Developed in 2015 in Belarus, the Flo Health app is designed to track menstrual cycles and other intimate aspects of women's reproductive health. The app has gained widespread use, with over 150 million users by December 2020, who trusted it with highly sensitive personal information.

Erica Frasco, a Flo Health user, filed a class-action lawsuit against the company in 2021. The lawsuit followed a damning report by the Wall Street Journal in 2019, which exposed the app's privacy infractions. Frasco and other users regularly answered intimate questions about their menstrual cycles, mood swings, birth control methods, sexual activity, and pregnancy plans.

### Breach of Trust and Legal Implications

Flo Health's privacy policy explicitly stated that it would not share user data with third parties unless necessary for service provision. However, between 2016 and 2019, the app shared intimate user data with companies including Facebook, Google, AppsFlyer, and Flurry. This data included detailed logs of user interactions within the app, which were shared without imposing any restrictions on how these third parties could use the information.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigated these allegations and settled with Flo Health in 2021. The settlement mandated an independent review of Flo Health's privacy policy and prohibited the company from misrepresenting its app. The class-action lawsuit seeks damages for the plaintiffs and a portion of the company's profits, citing common law invasion of privacy, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Stored Communications Act and the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act.

### Ongoing Concerns and Broader Implications

While Google and Flo Health have settled with the plaintiffs, Meta has not. The jury ruled that Meta intentionally "eavesdropped on and/or recorded their conversations by using an electronic device" without consent. This case raises critical concerns about privacy, particularly in the context of women's menstrual health, which has become a contentious issue following the US Supreme Court's removal of the constitutional right to abortion in June 2022.

The misuse of sensitive data by technology companies poses serious dangers to users. A report by ProPublica found that online pharmacies selling abortion pills were sharing sensitive data with Google and others, potentially providing law enforcement with evidence in cases against women. This underscores the need for greater vigilance and stricter regulations to protect user privacy.

## Conclusion

The ruling against Meta for accessing women's health data from the Flo app without consent highlights the urgent need for improved data protection measures. As technology continues to evolve, ensuring the privacy and security of sensitive health information must remain a top priority. Users must be cautious about the apps they trust with their personal data, and companies must be held accountable for violating privacy laws.

## Additional Resources

For further insights, check out these authoritative sources:

- [TechCrunch: Jury Rules Meta Violated California Privacy Laws](https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/05/jury-rules-meta-violated-california-privacy-laws-by-collecting-menstrual-health-data-from-flo/)
- [Wall Street Journal: Privacy Infractions by Flo Health](https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-give-apps-sensitive-personal-information-then-they-tell-facebook-11550851636)
- [Federal Trade Commission: Settlement with Flo Health](https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/192-3133-flo-health-inc)
- [ProPublica: Online Pharmacies Sharing Sensitive Data](https://www.propublica.org/article/websites-selling-abortion-pills-share-sensitive-data-with-google)

This version of the article is optimized for SEO, clarity, and readability, while maintaining a professional and informative tone. It includes a concise summary, improved structure, and relevant external links.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.