Meta Executives Settle Privacy Violations with $8 Billion Agreement
TL;DR
- Meta and its executives agreed to an $8 billion settlement for alleged privacy violations.
- The settlement aims to resolve claims of negligence and data misuse, avoiding further legal scrutiny.
- This move comes amid growing concerns about user privacy and data protection.
Main Content
Meta’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, along with other top executives, has agreed to settle long-standing privacy violation claims for a substantial $8 billion. This settlement is the latest in a series of high-profile payouts aimed at resolving allegations of user privacy breaches.
This is not the first instance where Meta, its subsidiary Facebook, or its executives have faced such allegations. The company has a history of addressing privacy violation claims with significant financial settlements.
The lawsuit in question accused Zuckerberg and other Meta leaders of failing to prevent years of privacy violations affecting Facebook users. Initially filed in September 2018, the case took years to process, eventually reaching the Delaware Court of Chancery. However, on just the second day of the trial, with Zuckerberg scheduled to testify the following week, the multibillion-dollar settlement was announced. The timing of this settlement has raised eyebrows among observers.
While Meta has not officially confirmed that the settlement was reached to avoid testimony, the circumstances suggest this as a likely motive.
The case was brought forth by shareholders who accused Meta executives of years of negligence and failure to enforce a 2012 agreement with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This agreement was designed to safeguard user data. Shareholders alleged that Zuckerberg and former Meta Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg “knowingly ran Facebook as an illegal data harvesting operation.”
The shareholders sought to have the 11 defendants reimburse the company for reputational damage caused by repeated privacy fiascos. The defendants denied these allegations, labeling them as “extreme claims.” Details of the settlement have not been disclosed, with the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Sam Closic, stating that the agreement “just came together quickly.”
In 2019, Facebook faced a record-breaking $5.1 billion penalty from the FTC for deceiving users about control over their personal data. The FTC ordered Facebook to implement new restrictions and overhaul its corporate structure to ensure greater accountability for user privacy decisions. This fine was imposed by the FTC after the agency found that Facebook had violated the earlier 2012 FTC order by misleading users about their ability to control the privacy of their personal information. The investigation was triggered by the Cambridge Analytica scandal, which revealed that the data of 50 million users was obtained without explicit permission and used for political purposes.
Additionally, Meta has faced several fines in the European Union (EU), including a 1.2 billion euro ($1.4 billion) fine for transferring personal data to the US without explicit consent.
Given these fines, the shareholders demanded that Zuckerberg and other executives reimburse Meta for the FTC penalty and other legal costs, estimated to be around $8 billion. They also questioned the timing of share sales by the executives.
By settling, Zuckerberg and the other defendants avoid having to answer probing questions under oath. In January, former Meta COO Sandberg was sanctioned for deleting sensitive emails related to the Cambridge Analytica investigation, complicating her testimony.
The Delaware Chancery Court will likely manage access to full court documents for this case through its case files or release them via public interest or watchdog groups as the settlement process concludes. Until then, speculation about the settlement’s magnitude will continue. The true reason behind Meta’s executives choosing to settle remains unclear, but it is reasonable to assume they expected continued trial damages and associated testimonies to be even more detrimental.
This settlement comes at a time when Meta is seeing many WhatsApp users switching to other messaging platforms, primarily Signal and Telegram, due to growing concerns about privacy and data-sharing practices. Additionally, a data breach at Instagram sparked global privacy concerns, making an ongoing lawsuit the last thing the company needs.
What has become clear is that many believe Meta continues to abuse users’ personal data for monetary gain. Despite promises to obtain specific user consent, offer privacy settings, and improve practices, Meta has consistently disregarded users’ privacy.
We don’t just report on threats – we help protect your social media
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your social media accounts by using Malwarebytes Identity Theft Protection.
Conclusion
The $8 billion settlement by Meta executives highlights the ongoing scrutiny and consequences faced by tech giants over privacy violations. As user concerns about data protection grow, companies must prioritize transparency and accountability to rebuild trust and avoid further legal entanglements.